Summary: Combine a red light with a near infrared light. Most common combination used seems to be low to mid 600s (around 635) and high 700s to low 800s (780-810). Some websites and studies also seem to like 670-680 as well. From what I’ve seen, the studies with the best results combined the two, and some even included blue/green light which doesn’t penetrate the skin as much as red/infrared light but still has positive effects. I will however say, I attribute the slight differences in preference to the fact that a few nm make it very difficult to determine measurable changes in the body. Also many of the studies were unfortunately small, not double blind, not random, and only tested 1-2 wavelengths, used non-red/infrared light and some used lasers as opposed to LED panels.

Some interesting things involving ATP. Max ATP production occurs 3-6 hours after red light is shone onto the body. Many use a combination of 2 lights in experiments. One paper ties the increase in ATP/other benefits of Red Light Therapy to redox reactions, which you may want to look at.

This one talks about how in vitro studies involving photobiomodulation are generally flawed in experimental set up

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459822/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3926176/

“Broadband polychromatic PBM showed no advantage over the red-light-only spectrum. However, both novel light sources that have not been previously used for PBM have demonstrated efficacy and safety for skin rejuvenation and intradermal collagen increase when compared with controls.”

https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962014000400616&lng=en&tlng=en

Best red light for atp production

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2996814/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355185/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215870/

https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc6462613

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25700769/

______________________________________________________________________________

Tiina Karu articles of interest:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1011134414002541?via%3Dihub

“Moreover we also report that a variety of biomolecules localized in mitochondria and/or in other cell compartments including cytochrome c oxidase, some proteins, nucleic acids and adenine nucleotides are light sensitive with major modifications in their biochemistry.”

-Used either laser or narrow band light (in this case both low power He–Ne laser with k = 632.8 nm, and non-coherent red light LED k = 650 ± 20 nm, were used).

There were several tests used to determine how light sensitive these biomolecules were by combining research on this topic from several papers and aggregating/analyzing results (refer to table 1). Most results showed positive correlation with light therapy/photobiomodulation including ATP production, # of mitochondria, mitochondria density, muscle regeneration.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643261/

“The peak at 620 nm belongs to reduced CuA, and that at 680 nm, to oxidized CuB atoms in cytochrome c oxidase molecule.”

What is CuA and CuB?

In “classical” CcO, CuA accepts electrons from cytochrome c which are then transferred via heme a to the coupled heme a 3-CuB dioxygen-reducing site.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16125966/

“A similarity is established between the peak positions at 616, 665, 760, 813, and 830 nm in the absorption spectra of the cellular monolayers and the action spectra of the long-term cellular responses (increase in the DNA synthesis rate and cell adhesion to a matrix).”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15739174/

“The well-structured action spectrum for the increase of the adhesion of the cells, with maxima at 619, 657, 675, 740, 760, and 820 nm, points to the existence of a photoacceptor responsible for the enhancement of this property (supposedly cytochrome c oxidase, the terminal respiratory chain enzyme), as well as signaling pathways between the cell mitochondria, plasma membrane, and nucleus.”

In terms of NO and its affects on light therapy, it seems

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12614475/

“Melatonin modifies the light action spectrum significantly in near IR region (760–840 nm only). Thus, the peak at 820–830 nm characteristic for the light action spectrum is fully reduced.”

We can possibly, according to this paper, extend the in vitro effects of this study to in vivo studies. This means that at wavelengths near-infrared, humans with higher levels of melatonin might be less susceptible to the positive benefits of red light therapy. Thus, especially if we use high wavelengths, we should figure out how one might try to optimize their melatonin levels.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19099388/?from_term=tiina+karu&from_page=2&from_pos=2

“The experimental results of our work demonstrate that irradiation at 632.8 nm causes either a (transient) relative reduction of the photoacceptor, putatively cytochrome c oxidase, or its (transient) relative oxidation, depending on the initial redox status of the photoacceptor.” 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15362946/

“The number of cells attached to glass substratum increases if HeLa cell suspension is irradiated with monochromatic visible-to-near infrared radiation before plating (the action spectrum with maxima at 619, 657, 675, 700, 740, 760, 800, 820, 840 and 860 nm).”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18307393/?from_term=tiina+karu&from_pos=9

“The biological effect (stimulation of cell attachment) of light with lambda = 637 nm on cells in our model system was pronounced, but did not depend on the degree of light polarization.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14872239/

“The well-structured relationship between this biological response and the radiation wavelength (action spectrum with maxima at 620, 680, 760, and 820 nm) suggests the existence of a photoacceptor responsible for the enhancement of attachment (presumably cytochrome c oxidase, the terminal enzyme of the respiratory chain) and, secondly, the existence of signaling pathways between the mitochondria, the plasma membrane, and the nucleus of the cell.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21796755/

“Cell adhesion and proliferation can be increased by irradiation with light of certain wavelengths (maxima in action spectrum are 619, 675, 740, 760, and 820 nm) or decreased when the activity of photoacceptor (cytochrome c oxidase in mitochondrial respiratory chain) is inhibited by chemicals before the irradiation.”

Summary of above:

Using these papers as a measure for the best wavelengths to irradiated red light on the body for maximum benefit, it seems as though Tiina Karu most commonly found the following wavelengths (in nm) to be most effective and as a result, were cited most commonly in her (looked it up and Tiina is a she) papers:

~620, ~680, ~760, ~820; frequently ~680 as well.

This correlates similarly, but not exactly with general consensus in other papers, which use ~635 nm and ~800 nm.

620-630, 670-680, 825-835

Brain related articles (first 3 copied from above):

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31050946/

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/pho.2016.4227?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26535475/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31050950/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31647776/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31647775/

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F5584_2018_234

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31390288/

—————————————————————————————-

ATP https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17603858/ 808nm

ATP lots of wavelengths  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29665018/

ATP superiority of red over blue green 2017 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28798481/

660 was better than 830 at atp production https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27857496/ 

Find out why pulsing was bad for the cells https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adbi.201900227

Lots of wavelengths Fibroblasts grew better with 660-70 while 810 actually reduced growth (fibroblasts make collagen. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15662631/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215870/

———————————————————-

Showing ability to illuminate brain using cadaver 670 and 808 nm https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25789711/

Comparison of LED to laser and showed no real difference

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24197518/

___________________________________

Quote I like -ROS are one of the classic “Janus face” mediators; beneficial in low concentrations and harmful at high concentrations; beneficial at brief exposures and harmful at chronic long-term exposures. ROS are produced at a low level by normal mitochondrial metabolism. The concept of mitohormesis was introduced to describe the beneficial of low controlled amounts of oxidative stress in the mitochondria. However when the mitochondrial membrane potential is altered either upwards or downwards, the amount of ROS is increased. In normal cells, absorption of light by Cox leads to an increase in mitochondrial membrane potential and a short burst of ROS is produced. However when the mitochondrial membrane potential is low because of pre-existing oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, or inhibition of electron transport, light absorption leads to an increase in mitochondrial membrane potential towards normal levels and the production of ROS is lowered.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *